Test Automation

Source: Wikipedia: Test Automation


Test automation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to:navigation, search
Merge-arrows.svg
It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with Test execution engine. (Discuss)
Merge-arrows.svg
It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with Test automation framework. (Discuss)

Compare with Manual testing.

Test automation is the use of software to control the execution of tests, the comparison of actual outcomes to predicted outcomes, the setting up of test preconditions, and other test control and test reporting functions[1]. Commonly, test automation involves automating a manual process already in place that uses a formalized testing process.
Contents
[hide]

* 1 Overview
* 2 Code-driven testing
* 3 Graphical User Interface (GUI) testing
* 4 What to test
* 5 Framework approach in automation
* 6 Popular Test Automation Tools
* 7 See also
* 8 References
* 9 External links

[edit] Overview

Although manual tests may find many defects in a software application, it is a laborious and time consuming process. In addition it may not be effective in finding certain classes of defects. Test automation is a process of writing a computer program to do testing that would otherwise need to be done manually. Once tests have been automated, they can be run quickly. This is often the most cost effective method for software products that have a long maintenance life, because even minor patches over the lifetime of the application can cause features to break which were working at an earlier point in time.

There are two general approaches to test automation:

* Code-driven testing. The public (usually) interfaces to classes, modules, or libraries are tested with a variety of input arguments to validate that the results that are returned are correct.
* Graphical user interface testing. A testing framework generates user interface events such as keystrokes and mouse clicks, and observes the changes that result in the user interface, to validate that the observable behavior of the program is correct.

Test automation tools can be expensive, and it is usually employed in combination with manual testing. It can be made cost-effective in the longer term, especially when used repeatedly in regression testing.

One way to generate test cases automatically is model-based testing through use of a model of the system for test case generation, but research continues into a variety of alternative methodologies for doing so.[citation needed]

What to automate, when to automate, or even whether one really needs automation are crucial decisions which the testing (or development) team must make. Selecting the correct features of the product for automation largely determines the success of the automation. Automating unstable features or features that are undergoing changes should be avoided.[2]
[edit] Code-driven testing

A growing trend in software development is the use of testing frameworks such as the xUnit frameworks (for example, JUnit and NUnit) that allow the execution of unit tests to determine whether various sections of the code are acting as expected under various circumstances. Test cases describe tests that need to be run on the program to verify that the program runs as expected.

Code driven test automation is a key feature of Agile software development, where it is known as Test-driven development (TDD). Unit tests are written to define the functionality before the code is written. Only when all tests pass is the code considered complete. Proponents argue that it produces software that is both more reliable and less costly than code that is tested by manual exploration. It is considered more reliable because the code coverage is better, and because it is run constantly during development rather than once at the end of a waterfall development cycle. The developer discovers defects immediately upon making a change, when it is least expensive to fix. Finally, code refactoring is safer; transforming the code into a simpler form with less code duplication, but equivalent behavior, is much less likely to introduce new defects.
[edit] Graphical User Interface (GUI) testing

Many test automation tools provide record and playback features that allow users to interactively record user actions and replay them back any number of times, comparing actual results to those expected. The advantage of this approach is that it requires little or no software development. This approach can be applied to any application that has a graphical user interface. However, reliance on these features poses major reliability and maintainability problems. Relabelling a button or moving it to another part of the window may require the test to be re-recorded. Record and playback also often adds irrelevant activities or incorrectly records some activities.

A variation on this type of tool is for testing of web sites. Here, the "interface" is the web page. This type of tool also requires little or no software development. However, such a framework utilizes entirely different techniques because it is reading html instead of observing window events.[citation needed]

Another variation is scriptless test automation that does not use record and playback, but instead builds a model of the application under test and then enables the tester to create test cases by simply editing in test parameters and conditions. This requires no scripting skills, but has all the power and flexibility of a scripted approach. Test-case maintenance is easy, as there is no code to maintain and as the application under test changes the software objects can simply be re-learned or added. It can be applied to any GUI-based software application.
[edit] What to test

Testing tools can help automate tasks such as product installation, test data creation, GUI interaction, problem detection (consider parsing or polling agents equipped with oracles), defect logging, etc., without necessarily automating tests in an end-to-end fashion.

One must keep satisfying popular requirements when thinking of test automation:

* Platform and OS independence
* Data driven capability (Input Data, Output Data, Meta Data)
* Customizable Reporting (DB Access, crystal reports)
* Easy debugging and logging
* Version control friendly – minimal binary files
* Extensible & Customizable (Open APIs to be able to integrate with other tools)
* Common Driver (For example, in the Java development ecosystem, that means Ant or Maven and the popular IDEs). This enables tests to integrate with the developers' workflows.
* Support unattended test runs for integration with build processes and batch runs. Continuous Integration servers require this.
* Email Notifications (automated notification on failure or threshold levels). This may be the test runner or tooling[clarification needed] that executes it.
* Support distributed execution environment (distributed test bed)
* Distributed application support (distributed SUT)

[edit] Framework approach in automation

A framework is an integrated system that sets the rules of Automation of a specific product. This system integrates the function libraries, test data sources, object details and various reusable modules. These components act as small building blocks which need to be assembled to represent a business process. The framework provides the basis of test automation and simplifies the automation effort.

There are various types of frameworks. They are categorized on the basis of the automation component they leverage. These are:

1. Data-driven testing
2. Modularity-driven testing
3. Keyword-driven testing
4. Hybrid testing
5. Model-based testing

[edit] Popular Test Automation Tools
Tool Name Company Name Latest Version
HP QuickTest Professional HP 10.5
IBM Rational Functional Tester IBM Rational 8.1.0.3
Rational robot IBM Rational 2001
Selenium OpenSource Tool 1.0.6
SilkTest Micro Focus 2009
TestComplete AutomatedQA 7.52
TestPartner Micro Focus 6.3
WATIR OpenSource Tool 1.6.5
[edit] See also
Portal-puzzle.svg Software Testing portal

* List of GUI testing tools
* Software testing
* Test automation framework
* Unit test

[edit] References
Text document with red question mark.svg
This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate. (February 2009)

1. ^ Kolawa, Adam; Huizinga, Dorota (2007). Automated Defect Prevention: Best Practices in Software Management. Wiley-IEEE Computer Society Press. p. 74. ISBN 0470042125. http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0470042125.html.
2. ^ Brian Marick. "When Should a Test Be Automated?". StickyMinds.com. http://www.stickyminds.com/sitewide.asp?Function=edetail&ObjectType=ART&ObjectId=2010. Retrieved 2009-08-20.

* Elfriede Dustin, et al.: Automated Software Testing. Addison Wesley, 1999, ISBN 0-20143-287-0
* Mark Fewster & Dorothy Graham (1999). Software Test Automation. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley. ISBN 978-0201331400.
* Roman Savenkov: How to Become a Software Tester. Roman Savenkov Consulting, 2008, ISBN 978-0-615-23372-7
* Hong Zhu et al. (2008). AST '08: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Automation of Software Test. ACM Press. ISBN 978-1-60558-030-2.

[edit] External links

* Automation Myths by M. N. Alam
* Generating Test Cases Automatically
* Importance of Test Automation
* Practical Experience in Automated Testing
* Test Automation: Delivering Business Value
* Test Automation Snake Oil by James Bach
* When Should a Test Be Automated? by Brian Marick
* Why Automation Projects Fail by Art Beall
* Guidelines for Test Automation framework

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_automation"
Categories: Software testing | Automation | GUI automation
Hidden categories: Articles to be merged from February 2010 | All articles to be merged | Articles to be merged from March 2010 | All articles with unsourced statements | Articles with unsourced statements from August 2009 | All pages needing cleanup | Wikipedia articles needing clarification from April 2010 | Articles lacking in-text citations from February 2009 | All articles lacking in-text citations
Personal tools

* New features
* Log in / create account

Namespaces

* Article
* Discussion

Variants

Views

* Read
* Edit
* View history

Actions

Search
Search
Navigation

* Main page
* Contents
* Featured content
* Current events
* Random article

Interaction

* About Wikipedia
* Community portal
* Recent changes
* Contact Wikipedia
* Donate to Wikipedia
* Help

Toolbox

* What links here
* Related changes
* Upload file
* Special pages
* Permanent link
* Cite this page

Print/export

* Create a book
* Download as PDF
* Printable version

Languages

* Deutsch
* Français
* Italiano
* Lietuvių
* 日本語
* Português
* Română
* Русский
* Slovenčina

* This page was last modified on 26 May 2010 at 11:25.
* Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. See Terms of Use for details.
Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License