Gospel of Judas

Source: Wikipedia: Gospel of Judas


The Gospel of Judas is a Gnostic gospel purported to document conversations between the apostle Judas Iscariot and Jesus Christ. The document is not claimed to have been written by Judas himself, but rather by Gnostic followers of Jesus. It exists in an early fourth-century Coptic text, though it has been proposed, but not proven, that the text is a translation of an earlier Greek version. The Gospel of Judas is probably from no earlier than the second century, since it contains theology that is not represented before the second half of the second century, and since its introduction and epilogue assume the reader is familiar with the canonical Gospels. The oldest Coptic document has been carbon dated to AD 280, plus or minus 50 years.

According to the canonical Gospels of the New Testament (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John), Judas betrayed Jesus to Jerusalem's Temple authorities, who handed Jesus over to the prefect Pontius Pilate, representative of the occupying Roman Empire, for crucifixion. The Gospel of Judas, on the other hand, portrays Judas in a very different perspective than do the Gospels of the New Testament, according to a preliminary translation made in early 2006 by the National Geographic Society: the Gospel of Judas appears to interpret Judas's act not as betrayal, but rather as an act of obedience to the instructions of Jesus. This assumption is taken on the basis that Jesus required a second agent to set in motion a course of events which he had planned. In that sense Judas acted as a catalyst. The action of Judas, then, was a pivotal point which interconnected a series of simultaneous pre-orchestrated events.

This portrayal seems to conform to a notion current in some forms of Gnosticism, that the human form is a spiritual prison, and that Judas thus served Christ by helping to release Christ's spirit from its physical constraints. The action of Judas allowed him to do that which he could not do directly. The Gospel of Judas does not claim that the other disciples knew gnostic teachings. On the contrary, it asserts that the disciples had not learned the true Gospel, which Jesus taught only to Judas Iscariot.

Question book-new.svg
This section needs additional citations for verification.
Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2010)
Judas Iscariot
Simple crossed circle.svg
This article is part of a series on Gnosticism
History of Gnosticism
Early Gnosticism
Syrian-Egyptic Gnosticism
Gnosticism in modern times
Simon Magus
Gnostic texts
Gnostic Gospels
Nag Hammadi library
Codex Tchacos
Askew Codex
Bruce Codex
Gnosticism and the New Testament
Related articles
Neoplatonism and Gnosticism
Bosnian Church
Esoteric Christianity
Gnosticism Portal
v • d • e

The codex Tchacos, a leather-bound Coptic papyrus [1] may have been discovered during the 1970s, near Beni Masah in Egypt. This has been translated and appears to be a text from the late 2nd century A.D. describing the story of Jesus's death from the viewpoint of Judas. The conclusion of the text refers (in Coptic) to the text as "the Gospel of Judas" (Euangelion Ioudas).

According to a 2006 translation of the manuscript of the text, it is apparently a Gnostic account of an arrangement between Jesus and Judas, who in this telling are Gnostic enlightened beings, with Jesus asking Judas to turn him in to the Romans to help Jesus finish his appointed task from God.

During the second and third centuries AD, various Christian sects composed texts which are loosely labeled New Testament Apocrypha; these texts are usually but not always “pseudeponymous”, i.e. falsely attributed to a notable figure, such as an apostle, of an earlier era.

The text is extant in only one manuscript, a fourth-century Coptic manuscript known as the Codex Tchacos, which surfaced in the 1970s, after about sixteen centuries in the desert of Egypt. The existing manuscript was radiocarbon dated "between the third and fourth century", according to Timothy Jull, a carbon-dating expert at the University of Arizona's physics centre. Only sections of papyrus containing no text were carbon-dated, because carbon dating is physically destructive.

Today the manuscript is in over a thousand pieces, due to poor handling and storage, with many sections missing. In some cases, there are only scattered words; in others, many lines. According to Rodolphe Kasser, the codex originally contained 31 pages, with writing on front and back; when it came to the market in 1999, only 13 pages, with writing on front and back, remained. It is speculated that individual pages had been removed and sold.

It has been speculated, on the basis of textual analysis concerning features of dialect and Greek loan words, that the current Coptic fourth century text may be a translation from an older Greek manuscript dating, at the earliest, to approximately AD 130–180.[2] Cited in support is the reference to a “Gospel of Judas” by the early Christian writer Irenaeus of Lyons, who, in arguing against Gnosticism, called the text a "fictitious history" (Refutation of Gnosticism, bk. 1 ch. 31). However, it is uncertain whether this text mentioned by Irenaeus is in fact the same text as the Coptic “Gospel of Judas” of the extant fourth century text, and there remains no solid evidence for an early Greek version.[3]

A. J. Levine, who was on the team of scholars responsible for unveiling the work, emphatically stated that the Gospel of Judas contains no new historical information concerning Jesus or Judas.[3] However, the text is helpful in reconstructing the history of Gnosticism, especially in Coptic-speaking areas.
[edit] Content
[edit] Ancient controversy
Question book-new.svg
This section needs additional citations for verification.
Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2010)

Irenaeus mentions a Gospel of Judas in his anti-Gnostic work Adversus Haereses (Against Heresies), written in about 180. He writes there are some who:

declare that Cain derived his being from the Power above, and acknowledge that Esau, Korah, the Sodomites, and all such persons, are related to themselves…They declare that Judas the traitor was thoroughly acquainted with these things, and that he alone, knowing the truth as no others did, accomplished the mystery of the betrayal; by him all things, both earthly and heavenly, were thus thrown into confusion. They produce a fictional history of this kind, which they style the Gospel of Judas.[4]

This is in reference to the Cainites, an alleged sect of Gnosticism that especially worshipped Cain as a hero. Irenaeus alleged that the Cainites, like a large number of Gnostic groups, were semi-maltheists believing that the god of the Old Testament — Yahweh — was evil, and a quite different and much lesser being than the deity that had created the universe, and who was responsible for sending Jesus. Such Gnostic groups worshipped as heroes all the Biblical figures who had sought to discover knowledge or challenge Yahweh's authority, while demonizing those who would have been seen as heroes in a more orthodox interpretation.

The Gospel of Judas belongs to a school of Gnosticism called Sethianism, a group who looked to Adam's son Seth as their spiritual ancestor. As in other Sethian documents, Jesus is equated with Seth: "The first is Seth, who is called Christ" although this is in part of an emanationist mythology describing both positive and negative aeons.

For metaphysical reasons, the Sethian Gnostics authors of this text maintained that Judas acted as he did in order that mankind might be redeemed by the death of Jesus' mortal body. For this reason, they regarded Judas as worthy of gratitude and veneration. The Gospel of Judas does not describe any events after the arrest of Jesus.

By contrast, the canonical Gospel of John, unlike the synoptic gospels, asserts that Jesus said to Judas, as the latter left the Last Supper to set in motion the betrayal process, "Do quickly what you have to do." (John 13:27) (trans. The New English Bible). Interpretations include: this was a direct command to Judas to do what he did; Jesus was speaking to Satan rather than to Judas (thus "Satan entered into Judas"); or Jesus knew what Judas was secretly plotting.

Some two centuries after Irenaeus' complaint, Epiphanius of Salamis, bishop of Cyprus, criticized the Gospel of Judas for treating as commendable the person whom he saw as the betrayer of Jesus, and as one who "performed a good work for our salvation." (Haeres., xxxviii).
[edit] The Gospel of Judas itself attacking other beliefs
This section does not cite any references or sources.
Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2010)

According to the Gospel, Judas was the only one of Jesus’ followers to fully understand the Gnostic teachings: "Knowing that Judas was reflecting upon something that was exalted, Jesus said to him: Step away from the others and I shall tell you the mysteries of the Kingdom. It is possible for you to reach it, but you will grieve a great deal. For someone else will replace you, in order that the twelve disciples may again come to completion with their God."

The Gospel of Judas goes even further, showing Jesus in various instances criticizing the other disciples for their ignorance and their followers of immorality.

When they tell Jesus about a vision, he points out its true meaning as follows: "Those you have seen receiving the offerings at the altar — that is who you are. That is the God you serve, and you are those twelve men you have seen. The cattle you saw brought for sacrifice are the many people you lead astray before that altar. (…) will stand and make use of my name in this way, and generations of the pious will remain loyal to Him."
[edit] Modern rediscovery
Ambox outdated serious.svg
This article may need to be updated. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information, and remove this template when finished. Please see the talk page for more information. (March 2010)
Question book-new.svg
This section needs additional citations for verification.
Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2010)

The initial translation of the Gospel of Judas was widely publicized but simply confirmed the account that was written in Irenaeus and known Gnostic beliefs, leading some scholars to simply summarize the discovery as nothing new.

However, it is argued that a closer reading of the existent text, as presented in October 2006, shows that Judas may have been set up to actually betray Jesus out of wrath and anger:

Truly [I] say to you, Judas, [those who] offer sacrifices to Saklas, the great fool, [… exemplify …] everything that is evil. But you will exceed all of them. For you will sacrifice the man that clothes me. Already your horn has been raised, your wrath has been kindled, your star has shone brightly, and your heart has [been hardened…]

The initial translators might have been misled by Irenaeus' summary, which although an exciting idea was not necessarily accurate. Their theory is now in dispute.

According to Elaine Pagels, Bible translators have mistranslated the Greek word for "handing over" to "betrayal".[5]

Like many Gnostic works, the Gospel of Judas claims to be a secret account, specifically "the secret account of the revelation that Jesus spoke in conversation with Judas Iscariot."

Over the ages many philosophers have contemplated the idea that Judas was required to have carried out his actions in order for Jesus to have died on the cross and hence fulfill theological obligations. The Gospel of Judas, however, asserts clearly that Judas' action was in obedience to a direct command of Jesus himself.

The Gospel of Judas states that Jesus told Judas "You shall be cursed for generations" and then added, "You will come to rule over them" and "You will exceed all of them, for you will sacrifice the man that clothes me." [6]

Unlike the four canonical gospels, which employ narrative accounts of the last year of life of Jesus (in the case of John, three years) and of his birth (in the case of Luke and Matthew), the Judas gospel takes the form of dialogues between Jesus and Judas, and Jesus and the twelve disciples, without being embedded in any narrative or worked into any overt philosophical or rhetorical context. Such "dialogue gospels" were popular during the early decades of Christianity, and indeed the four canonical gospels are the only surviving gospels in narrative form. The New Testament apocrypha contains several examples of the dialogue form, an example being the Gospel of Mary Magdalene.

Like the canonical gospels, the Gospel of Judas portrays the scribes as approaching Judas with the intention of arresting him, and Judas receiving money from them after handing Jesus over to them. But unlike Judas in the canonical gospels, who is portrayed as a villain, and excoriated by Jesus ("Alas for that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed. It would be better for that man if he had never been born," Mark 14:21; Matthew 26:24, trans. The New English Bible), the Judas gospel portrays Judas as a divinely appointed instrument of a grand and predetermined purpose. "In the last days they will curse your ascent to the holy (generation)."

Elsewhere in the manuscript, Jesus favours Judas above other disciples by saying, "Step away from the others and I shall tell you the mysteries of the kingdom," and "Look, you have been told everything. Lift up your eyes and look at the cloud and the light within it and the stars surrounding it. The star that leads the way is your star."

In the New Testament, Judas is said to have died by hanging himself (Matthew 27:3-10), or by bursting open after a fall (Acts 1:16-19). The Gospel of Judas does not specify the fate of Judas, although in the gospel, Judas tells Jesus he has had a vision where he is stoned to death by the eleven remaining apostles.
[edit] Rediscovery
[edit] Origins
This section does not cite any references or sources.
Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2010)
"The Kiss of Judas" is a traditional depiction of Judas by Giotto di Bondone, c. 1306. Fresco in the Scrovegni Chapel, Padua.

The content of the gospel had been unknown until a Coptic Gospel of Judas turned up on the antiquities "grey market," in Geneva in May 1983, when it was found among a mixed group of Greek and Coptic manuscripts offered to Stephen Emmel, a Yale Ph.D. candidate commissioned by Southern Methodist University to inspect the manuscripts. How this manuscript, Codex Tchacos, was found, maybe in the late 1970s, has not been clearly documented. However, it is believed that a now-deceased Egyptian "treasure-hunter" or prospector discovered the codex near El Minya, Egypt, in the neighbourhood of the village Beni Masar, and sold it to one Hanna, a dealer in antiquities resident in Cairo.

Around 1980, the manuscript and most of the dealer's other artifacts were stolen by a Greek trader named Nikolas Koutoulakis, and smuggled into Geneva. Hanna, in collusion with Swiss antiquity traders, recovered the manuscript and introduced it to experts who recognized its significance.
[edit] Sale and study

During the following two decades the manuscript was quietly offered to prospective buyers, but no major library or Egypt felt ready to purchase a manuscript that had such questionable provenance. In 2003 Michel van Rijn started to publish material about these dubious negotiations, and eventually the 62-page leather-bound codex was purchased by the Maecenas Foundation in Basel, a private foundation directed by lawyer Mario Jean Roberty. The previous owners now claimed that it had been uncovered at Muhafazat al Minya in Egypt during the 1950s or 1960s, and that its significance had not been appreciated until recently. It is worth noting that various other locations had been alleged during previous negotiations.

The existence of the text was made public by Rodolphe Kasser at a conference of Coptic specialists in Paris, July 2004. In a statement issued March 30, 2005, a spokesman for the Maecenas Foundation announced plans for edited translations into English, French, German, and Polish once the fragile papyrus has undergone conservation by a team of specialists in Coptic history to be led by a former professor at the University of Geneva, Rodolphe Kasser, and that their work would be published in about a year. A. J. Tim Jull, director of the National Science Foundation Arizona AMS laboratory, and Gregory Hodgins, assistant research scientist, announced that a radiocarbon dating procedure had dated five samples from the papyrus manuscript from 220 to 340 in January 2005 at the University of Arizona.[7] This puts the Coptic manuscript in the third or fourth centuries, a century earlier than had originally been thought from analysis of the script. In January 2006, Gene A. Ware of the Papyrological Imaging Lab of Brigham Young University conducted a multi-spectral imaging process on the texts in Switzerland, and confirmed their authenticity.[8]

Over the decades, the manuscript had been handled with less than sympathetic care: some single pages may be loose on the antiquities market (one half page turned up in Feb. 2006, in New York City[8]); the text is now in over a thousand pieces and fragments, and is believed to be less than three-quarters complete. "After concluding the research, everything will be returned to Egypt. The work belongs there and they will be conserved in the best way," Roberty has stated.[9]

In April 2006, an Ohio bankruptcy lawyer claimed to possess several small, brown bits of papyrus from the Gospel of Judas, but he refuses to have the fragments authenticated and his claim is being viewed with skepticism by experts.[10]
[edit] Responses and reactions
[edit] Scholarly debates

Professor Kasser revealed a few details about the text in 2004, the Dutch paper Het Parool reported.[11] Its language is the same Sahidic dialect of Coptic in which Coptic texts of the Nag Hammadi Library are written. The codex has four parts: the Letter of Peter to Philip, already known from the Nag Hammadi Library; the First Apocalypse of James, also known from the Nag Hammadi Library; the first few pages of a work related to, but not the same as, the Nag Hammadi work Allogenes; and the Gospel of Judas. Up to a third of the codex is currently illegible.

A scientific paper was to be published in 2005, but was delayed. The completion of the restoration and translation was announced by the National Geographic Society at a news conference in Washington, D.C. on April 6, 2006, and the manuscript itself was unveiled then at the National Geographic Society headquarters, accompanied by a television special entitled The Gospel of Judas on April 9, 2006, which was aired on the National Geographic Channel.

Terry Garcia, an executive vice president for Mission Programs of the National Geographic Society, asserted that the codex is considered by scholars and scientists to be the most significant ancient, non-biblical text to be found since the 1940s. However, James M. Robinson, one of America's leading experts on ancient religious texts, predicted that the new book would offer no historical insights into the disciple who betrayed Jesus, since the second-century manuscript seems to derive from an older document. Robinson suggests that the text will provide insights into the religion situation during the second century rather than into the biblical narrative itself.[citation needed]

One scholar on the National Geographic project believes the document shows that Judas was "fooled" into believing he was helping Jesus.[12]

Another scholar, April D. DeConick, a professor of Biblical studies at Rice University, reports in the New York Times [13] that the National Geographic translation was critically faulty in many substantial respects, and that based on a corrected translation, Judas was actually a demon, truly betraying Jesus, rather than following his orders. DeConick, after re-translating the text, published The Thirteenth Apostle: What the Gospel of Judas Really Says to assert that Judas was not a daimon in the Greek sense, but that "the universally accepted word for “spirit” is “pneuma ” — in Gnostic literature “daimon” is always taken to mean “demon”, as she wrote in presenting her conclusions in The New York Times, 1 December 2007. "Judas is not set apart 'for' the holy generation, as the National Geographic translation says", DeConick asserted, "he is separated 'from' it." A negative that was dropped from a crucial sentence, an error National Geographic admits, changes the import[citation needed]. "Were they genuine errors or was something more deliberate going on?" DeConick asked in the Op-Ed page of the Times.[14]

The National Geographic Society responded that 'Virtually all issues April D. DeConick raises about translation choices are addressed in footnotes in both the popular and critical editions'.[15]

André Gagné, Professor at Concordia University in Montreal also questioned how the experts of the National Geographic Society (NGS)[16] understood the role of Judas Iscariot in the Gospel of Judas.[17] His argument rests on the translation of the Greco-Coptic term apophasis as denial. According to Gagné, the opening lines of the Judas Gospel should not be translated as "the secret word of declaration by which Jesus spoke in conversation with Judas Iscariot" but rather as "the secret word of the denial by which Jesus spoke in conversation with Judas Iscariot" (Gospel of Judas 33:1).[18] Gagné's conclusion is that this gospel is the story of the denial of true salvation for Judas.
[edit] Religious responses

In his 2006 Easter address, Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury, strongly denied the historical credibility of the gospel, saying[19]

This is a demonstrably late text which simply parallels a large number of quite well-known works from the more eccentric fringes of the early century Church.

He went on to suggest that the book's publicity derives from an insatiable desire for conspiracy theories:

We are instantly fascinated by the suggestion of conspiracies and cover-ups; this has become so much the stuff of our imagination these days that it is only natural, it seems, to expect it when we turn to ancient texts, especially biblical texts. We treat them as if they were unconvincing press releases from some official source, whose intention is to conceal the real story; and that real story waits for the intrepid investigator to uncover it and share it with the waiting world. Anything that looks like the official version is automatically suspect.

Later the same year, Biblical scholar Louis Painchaud argued that the text suggests Judas was actually possessed by a demon.[20]
[edit] The uniqueness of the codex

The president of the Maecenas Foundation, Mario Roberty, suggested the possibility that the Maecenas Foundation had acquired not the only extant copy of the Gospel, but rather the only known copy. Roberty went on to make the suggestion that the Vatican probably had another copy locked away, saying:

In those days the Church decided for political reasons to include the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John in the Bible. The other gospels were banned. It is highly logical that the Catholic Church would have kept a copy of the forbidden gospels. Sadly, the Vatican does not want to clarify further. Their policy has been the same for years – 'No further comment.'[21]

Roberty provided no evidence to suggest that the Vatican does, in fact, possess any additional copy. While the contents of one part of the Vatican library have been catalogued and have long been available to researchers and scholars, the remainder of the library is, however, without a public catalogue, and though researchers may view any work within, they must first name the text they require, a serious problem for those who do not know what is contained by the library. The Pope responded on April 13, 2006[22]-

The Vatican, by word of Pope Benedict XVI, grants the recently surfaced Judas' Gospel no credit with regards to its apocryphal claims that Judas betrayed Jesus in compliance with the latter's own requests. According to the Pope, Judas freely chose to betray Jesus: "an open rejection of God's love". Judas, according to Pope Benedict XVI "viewed Jesus in terms of power and success: his only real interests lay in his power and success, there was no love involved. He was a greedy man: money was more important than communing with Jesus; money came before God and his love". According to the Pope it was due to these traits that led Judas to "turn liar, two-faced, indifferent to the truth", "losing any sense of God", "turning hard, incapable of converting, of being the prodigal son, hence throwing away a spent existence".

Spokespersons say the Vatican does not wish to suppress the Gospel of Judas; rather, according to Monsignor Walter Brandmüller, president of the Vatican's Committee for Historical Science, "We welcome the [manuscript] like we welcome the critical study of any text of ancient literature".[23] Even more explicitly, Father Thomas D. Williams, Dean of Theology at the Regina Apostolorum university in Rome, when asked:

Is it true that the Catholic Church has tried to cover up this text [Gospel of Judas] and other apocryphal texts?

answered as follows:

These are myths circulated by Dan Brown (who wrote/recorded them purely as part of a fictional novel) and numerous conspiracy theorists. You can go to any Catholic bookstore and pick up a copy of the Gnostic gospels. Christians may not believe them to be true, but there is no attempt to hide them.[24]

In AD 367, the bishop of Alexandria did urge Christians to “cleanse the church from every defilement” and to reject “the hidden books.”[25] It is possible that, in response to letters such as this one, some Christians destroyed or buried non-canonical gospels.
[edit] Notes

1. ^ "Judas 'helped Jesus save mankind'," BBC News website, April 7, 2006, accessed March 17, 2008
2. ^ For example, see H.-C. Puech and Beate Blatz, New Testament Apocrypha, vol. 1, p. 387.
3. ^ a b Ben Witherington III, What have they done with Jesus (San Francisco: Harper Collins, 2006), pp. 7-8.
4. ^ Irenaeus, Adversus Haereses (Against Heresies), I.31.1
5. ^ David Ian Miller, "FINDING MY RELIGION: Religious scholar Elaine Pagels on how the newly discovered Gospel of Judas sheds new light on the dawn of Christianity," San Francisco Chronicle website, April 2, 2007, accessed March 17, 2008
6. ^ "Text might be hidden 'Gospel of Judas'", CNN, April 6, 2006
7. ^ UA team verifies age of Gospel of Judas
8. ^ a b "Time line since discovery of Gospel of Judas". Lexington Herald-Leader. 2006-04-07. http://www.kentucky.com/mld/heraldleader/news/world/14284615.htm. Retrieved 2006-04-09.
9. ^ The hunt for the Gospel of Judas
10. ^ "Lawyer Says He's Got 'Gospel of Judas' Papyrus Fragments". FoxNews.com (AP). 2006-04-20. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,192410,00.html. Retrieved 2006-04-21.
11. ^ The Mysteries, The Official Graham Hancock Website
12. ^ CBC News. Judas no hero, scholars say. 4 December 2006.
13. ^ Deconick, April D. (December 1, 2007). "Gospel Truth". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/01/opinion/01deconink.html?_r=1&oref=slogin. Retrieved 2007-12-01.
14. ^ New York Times. April D. DeConick, "Gospel Truth", Op-Ed page, December 1, 2007.
15. ^ Statement from National Geographic in Response to April DeConick's New York Times Op-Ed "Gospel Truth".
16. ^ Kasser, Rudolphe, Marvin Meyer, and Gregor Wurst. The Gospel of Judas (Second Edition). Washington D.C.: National Geographic, 2008. p.29.
17. ^ See Northern Life article entitled: Religion Professor Disputes Translation of Judas Gospel.
18. ^ André Gagné, "A Critical Note on the Meaning of APOPHASIS in Gospel of Judas 33:1." Laval théologique et philosophique 63 (2007): 377-83.
19. ^ Archbishop of Canterbury's sermon BBC News, April 16, 2006
21. ^ "The hunt for the Gospel of Judas". unknown. http://ds009.xs4all.nl/artnews/parooltrans6-7.htm. Retrieved 2006-04-22.
22. ^ "Vatican: Pope Banishes Judas' Gospel". Agenzia Giornalistica Italia. 2006-04-13. http://www.agi.it/english/news.pl?doc=200604132030-1238-RT1-CRO-0-NF11&page=0&id=agionline-eng.oggitalia. Retrieved 2006-04-21.
23. ^ "Another Take on Gospel Truth About Judas: Manuscript Could Add to Understanding of Gnostic Sect". Washington Post. 2006-02-25. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/24/AR2006022401799.html. Retrieved 2006-04-21.
24. ^ "Interview With Father Thomas Williams". Zenit News Agency. 2006-04-05. http://www.zenit.org/english/visualizza.phtml?sid=87247. Retrieved 2006-05-06.
25. ^ Athanasius, Festal Epistles, 39.

[edit] See also

* Lost work
* Nag Hammadi Library
* Nag Hammadi
* The Passover Plot (1965), a book by the Biblical scholar Hugh J. Schonfield
* Tres versiones de Judas (1944), a short story by Jorge Luis Borges (from the collection Ficciones) in which a fictional Swedish theologian claims that Judas is the real savior of mankind
* The Last Temptation of Christ (1951), a novel by Nikos Kazantzakis (and film by Martin Scorsese) that depicts Judas in a similar vein to the Gospel of Judas
* Beelzebub's Tales to His Grandson (1950), by G. I. Gurdjieff, presents Judas in accordance with his depiction in the Gospel of Judas
* The Way of Cross and Dragon (1979), a short story by George R. R. Martin that includes a fictional Gospel of Judas
* The Judas Testament (1994), a novel by Daniel Easterman about the discovery of an autobiography of the historical Jesus
* The Gospel According to Judas (2007), a novel by Jeffrey Archer and Frank Moloney that presents the events of the New Testament through the eyes of Judas Iscariot
* Jedi Mind Tricks mention the Gospel of Judas in their song Heavy Metal Kings.
* A Time for Judas (1983), a novel by Morley Callaghan where plot is extremely similar to the content revealed in the Gospel of Judas
* The Judas Apocalypse (2008), a novel by Dan McNeil, in which a testament written by Judas reveals the true history of the Crucifixion

[edit] References

* The Gospel of Judas. Trans. and Eds. Rodolphe Kasser, Marvin Meyer, and Gregor Wurst. Washington, D.C.: National Geographic Society, 2006. [English Translation], ISBN 1-4262-0042-0
* The Gospel of Judas. Eds. Rodolphe Kasser, Marvin Meyer, and Gregor Wurst. Washington, D.C.: National Geographic Society, 2006. [Coptic Transcription]

* Brankaer, Joanna, and Hans Gebhard-Bethge. Codex Tchacos: Texte und Analysen. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2007.
* Cockburn, Andrew. “The Judas Gospel.” National Geographic Magazine. (May 2006): 78-95.
* DeConick, April D. The Thirteenth Apostle: What the Gospel of Judas Really Says. London: Continuum, 2007.
* Ehrman, Bart D. The Lost Gospel of Judas Iscariot: A New Look at Betrayer and Betrayed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
* Evans, Craig A. Fabricating Jesus: How Modern Scholars Distort the Gospels. Downers Grove: Intervarsity Press, 2006. ISBN 0-8308-3318-8.
* Gagné, André. “A Critical Note on the Meaning of APOPHASIS in Gospel of Judas 33:1”, Laval théologique et philosophique 63.2 (June 2007): 377-383.
* Gathercole, Simon J. “The Gospel of Judas.” Expository Times 118.5 (February 2007): 209-215.
* Gathercole, Simon. The Gospel of Judas: Rewriting Early Christianity. Oxford University Press, 2007.
* Head Peter M. “The Gospel of Judas and the Qarara Codices: Some Preliminary Observations.” Tyndale Bulletin 58 (2007): 1-23.
* Kasser, Rudolphe, Marvin Meyer, and Gregor Wurst. The Gospel of Judas. Commentary by Bart D. Ehrman. Washington D.C.: National Geographic, 2006.
* Kasser, Rudolphe, and Gregor Wurst. The Gospel of Judas, Critical Edition: Together with the Letter of Peter to Philip, James, and a Book of Allogenes from Codex Tchacos. Washington D.C.: National Geographic, 2007.
* Krosney, Herbert. The Lost Gospel: The Quest for the Gospel of Judas Iscariot. Washington D.C.: National Geographic, 2006.
* Meyer, Marvin, ed. The Nag Hammadi Scriptures: The International Edition. New York: HarperOne, 2007.
* Pagels, Elaine, Elaine Pagels and Karen L. King. Reading Judas: The Gospel of Judas and the Shaping of Christianity. New York: Viking, 2007. ISBN 978-0-670-03845-9
* Perrin, Nicholas. The Judas Gospel. Downers Grove: Intervarsity Press, 2006.
* Porter, Stanley E., and Gordon L. Heath. The Lost Gospel of Judas: Separating Fact from Fiction. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007.
* Robinson, James M. The Secrets of Judas : The Story of the Misunderstood Disciple and His Lost Gospel. San Francisco: Harper, 2006.
* Wright, N. T. Judas and the Gospel of Jesus: Have we Missed the Truth about Christianity? Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2006.

* Gregory A. Page, Diary of Judas Iscariot of the Gospel According to Judas (1912, reprinted 1942, Kessinger Publishing)
* Lars Gyllensten, Testament of Cain (1963 Bonnier, Stockholm, Sweden; English translation in 1982, Persea)

[edit] External links
Search Wikimedia Commons Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Gospel of Judas
Search Wikiquote Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to: Gospel of Judas

* The Gospel of Judas PDF Version hosted by nationalgeographic.com
* L' Evangile de Judas sur Coptica.ch - texte, index et traduction française
* The Lost Gospel - online feature from National Geographic
* Early Christian Writings: Gospel of Judas
* Patrick Baert, "Gospel of Judas back in spotlight after 20 centuries"
* Judas stars as 'anti-hero' in gospel - Julia Duin, Washington Times - April 7, 2006
* The Lost Gospel of Judas Iscariot? - NPR
* Rodney J. Decker on the Gospel of Judas sensation (PDF, audio, and PowerPoint)
* Michel van Rijn, "The Hunt for the Gospel of Judas"
* Gospel of Judas does not deserve name 'gospel,' Jesuit scholar says
* Text of Irenaeus, Against Heresies, regarding Gospel of Judas
* Survey of Early Reaction to the Gospel of Judas - 100 citations
* "The Betrayer's Gospel" — Article from the New York Review of Books
* The Betrayal of Judas - An overview of the translation controversy, from the Chronicle Review
* Associations between the Gospel of Judas and the Coptic Orthodox Church — the Coptic Orthodox Church's response to the alleged "Gospel" of Judas
* Not so secret gospels – BBC article

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License